Three thinking levels
Minimal, medium and high. Nano Banana 2 exposes only minimal and high, so a middle setting would be a cheaper way to get better prompt adherence without paying for full reasoning on every image.
Model · Google Nano Banana 2.5 · not released yet
The rumored next image model in Google's Nano Banana family, expected to sit above Nano Banana 2 and reportedly tested in public under the codename "spicy-mayo". As of September 22, 2026, Google hasn't announced it: no model card, no price, no entry in the Gemini API docs. Leaks point to a launch soon, with three thinking levels and 512px to 4K output. We'll update this page the day Google confirms anything.

"Nano Banana" is Google's consumer name for its Gemini image models, and the numbering doesn't follow the Gemini version numbers. That trips people up constantly. The original Nano Banana is actually Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, so plenty of pages you'll find while searching for "Nano Banana 2.5" are really about the 2025 model. In 2026, Nano Banana 2.5 means a successor to Nano Banana 2 (released February 26, 2026), not the old Gemini 2.5 model. If the pattern holds, it'll ship under a Gemini 3.x or later Flash Image id, with "2.5" kept as the marketing name. That part is my guess, not a leak.
Here's the family according to Google's image generation docs, with the rumored model at the bottom.
| Name | API model | Resolutions | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana | gemini-2.5-flash-image | 1K | Legacy |
| Nano Banana Pro | gemini-3-pro-image | 1K, 2K, 4K | Available |
| Nano Banana 2 | gemini-3.1-flash-image | 512px to 4K | Available |
| Nano Banana 2 Lite | gemini-3.1-flash-lite-image | 1K | Available |
| Nano Banana 2.5 | nano-banana-2.5 (reported) | 512px to 4K (reported) | Not released |
Everything public so far fits in about two weeks. I've listed only claims with a traceable origin.
Sept 4–5
The name "Nano Banana 2.5 Flash" found in Gemini desktop app code
TestingCatalog report
Sept 9
An anonymous Google-style image model, "spicy-mayo", appears in Image Arena battles
Community testers on X (@LuminaBench)
Sept 14
The "spicy-mayo" label spotted in Arena's public leaderboard config, provider not named
PicVane report
Sept 18
Claims that partners got access under the model id nano-banana-2.5, reportedly in a 24-hour window
@lyraxana, @pankajkumar_dev on X
Sept 18
Gemini API release notes list no new image model
Two things stand out. First, the sources are independent of each other: one came from app code, one from Arena, one from partner access. Second, none of it comes from Google. TestingCatalog has a decent record on Gemini leaks. Anonymous X accounts are a different story, even though @lyraxana got another pre-announcement call right the same week.

Nobody outside Google knows the date. The most specific claim is from the September 18 partner reports, which expected a broader release "during the week of September 21". That's this week, as I write this.
How much weight should that carry? Some, honestly. Anonymous Arena testing plus a short partner window is what a model looks like right before launch, and a 24-hour partner window usually means a final check, not early research. But "expected this week" claims slip all the time, and a code string in an app can sit there for months.
My read: a launch in late September or October looks likely. A launch with the exact name "Nano Banana 2.5 Flash" is less certain, because the Flash naming might just be leftover from the old Gemini 2.5 Flash Image branding.
Treat every card below as unconfirmed. These come from tester impressions and the partner reports, not from Google.
Minimal, medium and high. Nano Banana 2 exposes only minimal and high, so a middle setting would be a cheaper way to get better prompt adherence without paying for full reasoning on every image.
512px, 1K, 2K and 4K — the same range as Nano Banana 2. No rumor so far about 8K or bigger canvases.
Most early Arena impressions describe a genuine step up, not a small tune-up.
Testers called spicy-mayo good at text inside posters and product shots.
@LuminaBench reported a failure on a Rubik's cube task and described the model as "strong at text but weak on logical tasks".
That's the one area where testers didn't see it winning.
What's missing from the rumors is just as telling. Nobody has leaked a price, a context window, reference image limits or anything about editing. For most of our users, price is the one that matters.
Probably, but it isn't proven. Arena's blind battles hide the provider on purpose, and spicy-mayo can't be picked by name: you only see it if the random matchmaking gives it to you. The link to Google rests on output style and on the timing matching the code leak.
The partner reports are the strongest link, since they name spicy-mayo and nano-banana-2.5 in the same breath. If those are accurate, the question is settled. If they're not, spicy-mayo could still be a Google model under a different final name (it happens), or even a checkpoint that never ships.
One more caveat about Arena impressions. A few dozen blind votes on hand-picked prompts tell you how a model does on those prompts, and not much about your specific use case. Product photographers and meme makers will judge the same model very differently.

The two headline claims about spicy-mayo were "great at text" and "failed a Rubik's cube", so I ran both kinds of prompts through Nano Banana 2 on our platform to get a baseline. Both images are unedited first attempts at 1K, $0.06 each.


So the bar for "strong at text" is already high: to be noticeable, Nano Banana 2.5 has to do better on long paragraphs, small print or non-Latin scripts, not on a three-line poster.
The cube passed too, but to be fair it's an easier task than whatever spicy-mayo reportedly failed. We don't know the exact Arena prompt, and a scrambled cube or a mid-solve state is much harder to draw correctly. Still, it shows why a single Arena anecdote shouldn't decide anything. When 2.5 ships, we'll rerun these exact prompts and add the results here side by side.
Yes, that's the plan once Google makes it publicly available. We added Nano Banana 2 Lite on its launch day, and we'd like to do the same here. The price will depend on Google's own rate, which isn't known yet, so I won't guess at a number. Here's what the current family costs, pay-as-you-go with no subscription.
| Model | 512px | 1K | 2K | 4K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nano Banana 2 Lite1K only, cheapest | — | $0.03 | — | — |
| Nano Banana 2fast, up to 4K | $0.03 | $0.06 | $0.09 | $0.13 |
| Nano Banana Prodense text, hero images | — | $0.11 | $0.11 | $0.20 |
| Nano Banana 2.5price not announced | — | — | — | — |
Prices are per image. A dash means the model does not sell that tier. Deposits of $50 add 5% to your balance and $100 adds 10%; an active promo code adds another 10% on top of the same deposit. The +5% / +10% volume bonus applies to crypto top-ups only.
For most people, no. Nano Banana 2 already handles clean text, product shots and multi-image references well, and Nano Banana Pro is still the model I'd pick for dense text or a hero image that everybody sees. A new version doesn't make your existing results worse.
There's one case where waiting makes sense. If you keep hitting a specific Nano Banana 2 limit on one type of image and the job isn't urgent, a couple of weeks might pay off. Otherwise, generate now and compare later: prompts written for Nano Banana 2 will almost certainly carry over.
The honest downside of any launch week: new models tend to be slower and more often overloaded in the first days. Don't move a production pipeline to 2.5 the morning it comes out.
Prompt structure that works across the whole family — and will carry over to 2.5.
Read the guideThe same prompts through the Google side of the catalogue, with costs and failure cases.
Read the guideWhere the cheapest model in the family is enough, and where it isn't.
Read the guideNo. As of September 22, 2026, Google hasn't announced or released Nano Banana 2.5. It only exists in leaks, an anonymous Arena model called spicy-mayo and reported short partner access.
No. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image is the original Nano Banana from August 2025. Nano Banana 2.5 is the rumored successor to Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image).
An anonymous image model that appeared in Image Arena on September 9, 2026. It's widely believed to be Nano Banana 2.5, and September 18 partner reports tie the two together, but Google hasn't confirmed it.
Unknown. No price has leaked. For comparison, Nano Banana 2 starts at $0.03 per image on BananaBanana and Nano Banana Pro at $0.11.
Only indirectly: spicy-mayo sometimes shows up in Image Arena's blind battles, but you can't select it. Once it's public, it'll appear in the model picker of the BananaBanana generator.
New accounts start with $0.20 on the balance. Nano Banana 2 from $0.03 per image, no subscription — and 2.5 lands in the same picker the day it's public.